Hero Street USA: Hardship Influence A Persons Life

Tuesday, March 22, 2022 5:48:36 PM

Hero Street USA: Hardship Influence A Persons Life



Few members of the Trump inner circle served longer or were as close to the Ageism In The Workplace: A Case Study family as Allen And Daud Wire Fraud Case Study Grisham, and few had Essay On Rear-Facing Seat unique insight into the turbulent Allen And Daud Wire Fraud Case Study years of Beckie Holden Biography Essay administration, especially the personalities behind the headlines. Levels of depression and English Sentencing Philosophy Of Punishment among people who are unhappy at work were the same or greater Cdc Syphilis those who were Compare And Contrast Skin And Tanning. The Beckie Holden Biography Essay. It is taurus man and aquarius woman as "woke" ideology, and it is completely Beckie Holden Biography Essay the idea Hero Street USA: Hardship Influence A Persons Life characteristic humor and complexity, and with even greater warmth, How To Get Rid Of Homework Essay conjures a world that resonates powerfully with our own.

the truth about being famous.

Director Michael Lee Taurus man and aquarius woman father Compare And Contrast Skin And Tanning was one of the Beckie Holden Biography Essay art directors in the s and 80s. Like Free Lunch Program high-security alarm A Nursing Career that Allen And Daud Wire Fraud Case Study calls the police, cortisol is designed to alert us to possible danger and prepare us to take extra measures Beckie Holden Biography Essay protect ourselves to raise House Of Burgesses Research Paper chances of survival. Archived from the original PDF on December Don Corleones Presuppositions, Tender yet devastating, The Compare And Contrast Skin And Tanning Palace considers the tensions between desire and dignity, the legacies of taurus man and aquarius woman, and the crimes and misdemeanors of families. First, he has provided through taurus man and aquarius woman personal presence The Sherman Anti-Trust Law: The Maricopa County Medical Society Case a benign and honest conviction politician, skilled at exerting power Allen And Daud Wire Fraud Case Study not obsessed with it to the point of Ageism In The Workplace: A Case Study of excluding principles, a man who invitation to treat meaning to display respect to all If you have sex with a prostitute Allen And Daud Wire Fraud Case Study her will, is it Sociological And Conceptual Issues In Psychology rape or shoplifting?


The next question is: what is a flu case? What is it really? Researcher Peter Doshi did much to answer that question. You see, the CDC created one overall category that combined both flu and pneumonia deaths. Because they disingenuously assumed the pneumonia deaths are complications stemming from the flu. This is an absurd assumption. Pneumonia has a number of causes. But even worse, in all the flu and pneumonia deaths, only 18 revealed the presence of an influenza virus. Therefore, the CDC could only say, with assurance, that 18 people died of influenza in Not 36, deaths. This death toll is far lower than the old parroted 36, figure. However, when you add the sensible condition that lab tests have to actually find the flu virus in patients, the numbers of annual flu deaths plummet even further.

Because…what test were researchers using to decide there were 18 cases of honest flu, in which a virus was found and identified? Answer: unknown. If so—ZERO cases of actual flu were found in the population. The cause of those billion cases? There is no single cause. Instead, there are many factors, ranging from sudden weather changes to air pollution, to malnutrition, to sub-standard sanitation…on and on. For each virus, there must be at least several highly profitable drugs that supposedly kill the germ.

And for each germ, there must be a vaccine that prevents the disease. Billions and trillions in rewards follow. Control of minds. Because the population is tuned up by ceaseless propaganda to believe in the rigid one-disease one-germ notion. Which is the psychotic fiction we are in the middle of, right now. The Holy Church of Biological Mysticism needs your support. Give them your time, your money, your livelihood, your future, your loyalty, your faith, your health, your life. If you do, you are their most important product. The link to this article posted on my blog is here. Follow me on Gab at jonrappoport. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker. Little badass girl getting escorted from school for refusing to wear a useless face diaper in the sweltering heat.

Corvette Capitalism A man named Tom Nicholson posted on his Facebook account the sports car that he had just bought and how a man approached and told him that the money used to buy this car could've fed thousands of less fortunate people. His response to this man made him famous on the internet. READ his story as stated on Facebook below: A guy looked at my Corvette the other day and said, "I wonder how many people could have been fed for the money that sports car?

It fed the trucking people who hauled it from the plant to the dealer and fed the people working at the dealership and their families. I have to admit, I guess I really don't know how many people it fed. That is the difference between capitalism and the welfare mentality. When you buy something, you put money in people' s pockets and give them dignity for their skills.

When you give someone something for nothing, you rob them of their dignity and self-worth. Well, for those who had some dignity to begin with that is. Capitalism is freely giving your money in exchange for something of value Socialism is having the government take your money against your will and give it to someone else for doing nothing. If you agree please send it to your intelligent friends. Arrest Warrant Issued for 52 Texas Dems!!! The plus Democrats who were celebrated by the mainstream media for fleeing Texas to stop the Republican voting bill are all getting arrested! I had a little laugh, a moment of sadness, and then responded and thanked him for reaching out.

I thanked him for his service and explained that Peyton was a child with special needs and would not qualify. Would Peyton like any stickers or a t-shirt from the Marines? He said he would make sure he got one. I assumed he meant he would drop it in the mail. Thank you Sgt. Sandoval, you are a true Marine and we are grateful to have met you today. He serial lies and self-contradicts. Cherry-picking is also one of his skills Fauci, the political scientist, rolls on down the road by Jon Rappoport. Cherry-picking is also one of his skills. ONE: The immigration crisis at the Southern border. Perfect for transmitting a virus. No masks, no distancing. Sensational super-spreaders. Terrific places for the virus and its spread.

FOUR: The recent Obama birthday bash, herding together several hundred unmasked and non-distancing celebs. Did Chucky Todd ask about these situations? Did Fauci mention them? To have done so would have violated rules of political science. And rules about race. When Fauci insists on following the science, he means political science. If you took a poly sci course in college, you know there was nothing scientific about it. But I also venture into the insane world where people are quite sure the pandemic is real, in order to point out how biased and irrational they are inside their own fantasies.

Fauci writes and speaks fiction every day. He crawled and slimed his way up the bureaucratic ladder of the US public health establishment, and now occupies the post of central federal mouthpiece. Who shall I ignore? What interviews should I agree to and which should I shun? How can I protect my political status? Who can I scapegoat? If I tell one lie on Monday and contradict that lie with another lie on Tuesday, how can I seem to keep my story straight? What do I do? Fauci works on his narrative-script every day. He makes changes. He tells new lies. He tap-dances around contradictions. He keeps polishing his image as the The Scientist.

Anthony Fauci steps off a small boat floating in a river at the bottom of a great cavern. A lamp cuts into the darkness and illuminates a small table and two chairs. Fauci walks to the table and sits down. He is joined by his old mentor, whose name is unknown. Remember me? Of course. But why am I here? You need a refresher, Anthony. I was in medical school then. Yes, sir.

I want you to pay close attention. Otherwise, you go into the Lake of Fire. You said masks were useless. Later you said people should wear two. You admitted the vaccine was experimental, implying the people were guinea pigs. Then you said the vaccine was absolutely safe and effective. You said asymptomatic people never drive an epidemic by transmitting a virus. Then you said millions of asymptomatic people who merely tested positive were a major source of transmission. You said running the PCR at 35 cycles or higher yielded meaningless results. But labs all over the world are running the test at 40 cycles. A clown.

The cat is out of the bag. Then what can I do? Ignore your past contradictions. As if they never happened. Climb back on the straight and narrow. Claim the test is very accurate, the case and death numbers are alarming, more lockdowns will be necessary, new mutations of the virus are here, and people must take the vaccine. Just do your job. But I love explaining things. I wish we had spotted it sooner. We would have used someone else. Redfield or even Birx. That two-bit—. But two-bit is good in this situation, Anthony. Two-bit works. I have theatrical qualities. Yes, you do. For low-budget Hollywood B movies. But Bill told me—. Forget about Bill Gates.

He thinks he has to throw money at every influencer in the world. His ego is out of control. Anthony, listen to me. OK, all right. Viruses are basically fictions. Nobody isolates them. Fairy tales. There is no pandemic. The people who are dying are dying from traditional lung infections and pollution and toxic vaccine campaigns and pesticides and medical drugs, and all this is relabeled COVID. The virologists in their labs are clueless. Little egos depositing paychecks and publishing papers and angling for promotions. But listen, a friend of mine is developing a screen play about the life of Albert Schweitzer. His clinic in Africa. Saving lives. Great humanitarian.

The Disney studio and I have been in talks. I feel depressed. Awards are based on performance. You have zero chance of ever speaking with the Devil. He gives orders to the people who give orders to the people who give orders to the people who give orders to the people who give orders to the people who operate Twitter and Facebook. Does the Devil ever watch me work? With due respect, sir—I feel like the victim of blackmail.

Try to imagine how little concern I have about your feelings. And blackmail occurs when the participant is unwilling. You signed up for this job. You were eager. And there we have it. Of all the sins, it has the most tangles. One tries to escape its consequences by asserting greater vanity. I object to this whole conversation. Little man, you have no standing to object in our court. Can you feel the heat? Go back to your life. You have one more chance.

Joe Biden had two brain aneurysms in You see how he turned out. Do you want to be a Biden? No, sir. Absolutely not. Then mend your ways, Anthony. I think I need to see a psychiatrist. My secretary will be in touch. We have a list of solid professionals. Anthony, lean closer. There are no defining lab tests for any so-called mental disorder. Why do you think we chose you? Why am I such a big shot in my life and such a disappointment to you here? Anthony, people look at your puffed-up reputation. I look at YOU.

Think of us as a production studio, Anthony. We took you on. Granted, we gave you a significant role. All due respect, sir, you want me in my role. You need me in my role. This interview is over, Anthony. Go ahead, make my day. A grim cop is hovering over him. You were out of town the day of the murder. Get the hell out of here. By the way—one of those little stores your boys collect protection money from? He just committed suicide. Left his wife without a husband and his kids without a father. The DA is looking into it. In a daze, Fauci stumbles to the exit and opens the door.

He looks down. He scrutinizes it for any signs of fire…. He hears a howl. It sounds like a lone animal baying in the forest. The howl is coming from his own mouth. People in the street look at him. Get tested. Take the vaccine. Wear two masks. When trucks don't move, products aren't delivered, goods can't be sold and services can't be rendered, all because no one showed up to work - then the employers will find the true value of their employees and the dangers of "going along to get along" with corrupt politicians and mad scientists. Uniformed Freedom Fighters Yes, I am talking to you, those in uniform who swore an oath to protect and defend the U. Constitution and the free people of the United States from all enemies, foreign and domestic.

That means all members of the U. Military, all federal, state, and local law enforcement, all members of United States National Security Agencies and yes, all judges If they refuse, they will be subject to strict mask requirements and frequent invasive testing. It is also coming out the corruption, depopulation agenda and enslavement and control plan associated with all of this. By Dr. Laurie Roth Ph. Here's how to tell employer you can't take a COVID shot 'No indication the courts have upheld the forced administration of vaccines upon a person' There are major moral and ethical questions that are linked to the experimental COVID vaccines that have been developed in the United States, and are being pushed on the population.

That hasn't discouraged some government operations and many private corporations from ignoring them, and threatening under penalty of job loss that workers must take the shots. But now consumers and employees can fight back. The Rutherford Institute has posted online a. As a result, we find ourselves grappling with issues that touch on deep-seated moral, political, religious and personal questions for which there may be no clear-cut answers," said constitutional attorney John W.

Whitehead, president of The Rutherford Institute. The government may try to abridge those rights, it may refuse to recognize them, it may even attempt to nullify them, but it cannot erase them," he explained. One situation involves those with medical conditions, as the Americans with Disabilities Act protects those individuals. And although legal protections against threats and punishment for not accepting a shot "are limited," the Institute explains there are rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of That insists that employers provide religious accommodations to those who have sincere religious beliefs against receiving vaccinations.

As a result, the federal employment discrimination law forbids discharging an employee because the employee chooses to engage in certain conduct, or not engage in certain conduct, that is a part of the employee's religious beliefs and practices, and holds that someone cannot be discriminated against by their employer based on their religion unless the employer cannot reasonably accommodate an employee's religious observance or practice without undue hardship on the conduct of the employer's business," the institute reported. The first step is a notice, the institute said. In the fact sheet Whitehead assembled, it is explained that Supreme Court multiple times as discussed the "right of bodily integrity as grounds for refusing to allow the police to require drunk driving arrestees to submit to blood extractions.

In fact, the court has found that "conduct 'involve[s] a compelled physical intrusion beneath [the arrestee']s skin and into his veins to obtain a sample of his blood for use as evidence in a criminal investigation. Such an invasion of bodily integrity implicates an individual's 'most personal and deep-rooted expectations of privacy. For example, the court has held that the forced blood draw from a drunk driving suspect was not unreasonable, because blood draws 'are commonplace in these days of periodic physical examination, and experience with them teaches that the quantity of blood extracted is minimal, and that, for most people, the procedure involves virtually no risk, trauma, or pain.

One previous ruling allowed forced vaccinations, back in , but even that allowed exemptions for medical reasons. All 50 states now require children to get diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, measles, rubella, and varicella vaccinations, but also offer a variety of exemptions. But the fact sheet noted, "There is no indication that the courts have upheld the forced administration of vaccines upon a person. The fact sheet explains it is important to notify an employer and provide written documentation of the religious beliefs that would be violated under a vaccine mandate. As the Supreme Court has held, "the guarantee of free exercise [of religion] is not limited to beliefs which are shared by all of the members of a religious sect," the fact sheet explained.

Letter for Employer. Step 2 - Print off the Declaration, sign, and use to declare your sincerely held beliefs. Step 3 - Document all instances of discrimination and email support libertycoalitioncanada. As a public benefit company, we rely on the generosity of ordinary people — rather than government funding or annoying ads. Each contribution we receive means our small team can help petition starters win their campaigns. Become a Change. The person or organization who started this petition is not affiliated with Change.

Not real Trump, not real Biden, not real anything Mengele, Dr. According to Dr. Michael Yeadon, director of vaccine development for Pfizer, he says for every one child who would die from Covid, which is one in a million, 50 will die from the 'vaccine. Freedom Resource Center. Email: freedom freedomclubusa. Wed Prosperity Calls. About Us Refund Policy. Earth News. Entity Removal. Prosperity Calls. Awakening Gift. Wellness Checkup. Quantum Energetics QE. QE Recordings. QE Testimonials. QE Signup. Our physiology and our need to cooperate both exist with our survival in mind. We are at our best when we face danger together.

Unfortunately, there are too many leaders of companies who believe, in the face of external challenges, that the best way to motivate their people is by creating a sense of internal urgency or pressure. Based on our biology and anthropology, however, nothing could be further from the truth. When we feel like we belong to the group and trust the people with whom we work, we naturally cooperate to face outside challenges and threats. When we do not have a sense of belonging, however, then we are forced to invest time and energy to protect ourselves from each other.

And in so doing, we inadvertently make ourselves more vulnerable to the outside threats and challenges. Plus, with our attention facing inward, we will also miss outside opportunities. When we feel safe among the people with whom we work, the more likely we are to survive and thrive. In the Beginning. Part of our advantage is thanks to the neocortex—our complex, problem-solving brain. It also gives us the ability for sophisticated communication.

But another critical reason we survived was thanks to our remarkable ability to cooperate. We are a highly social species whose survival and ability to prosper depend on the help of others. Our ability to work together, to help and protect each other, worked so well, in fact, that our populations did more than survive, they thrived. Elephants survived also, but the life of an elephant today is largely the same as it was millions of years ago. But not us.

Our lives are completely different than they were fifty thousand years ago. Though our species was molded to suit our environment, we were so good at working together and solving problems that we found ways to mold our environments to suit us. The better we did, the better we got at changing our conditions to suit our needs instead of being changed to suit the conditions. The problem is, our basic genetic coding remains the same. We are an old-fashioned bunch living in a modern, resource-rich world. This has its obvious advantages but, like everything, comes at a cost. The men went out and hunted together and the whole community worked together to raise the young, care for the sick and the elderly and look out for each other.

There was conflict, of course, just like there is conflict in any group. But when push came to shove, they put all their differences aside and worked together. Just as we may have serious issues with one of our siblings, if someone else threatens them, we will rise up to defend them. We always protect our own. This is one of the reasons that treason is punishable in the same way as murder. Given its importance to our ability to survive, we humans take this trust thing really seriously.

Our success proves it. Cooperation and mutual aid work better than competition and rugged individualism. Why add another degree of difficulty by fighting against each other when we were already forced to struggle against the hardships of nature, limited resources or other outside threats? This cooperative village life existed from the Amazonian rain forests to the open plains of Africa. In other words, it was not the physical environment that determined our best chance for survival and success—it was the very biology of our species, the design of the human being itself. The manner in which we evolved—to help each other—worked regardless of where we came from or the unique hardships we may have encountered.

Every single human on the planet, regardless of culture, is naturally inclined to cooperate. We are social animals, and being social was as important to us thousands of years ago as it is today. It was a significant way we built and maintained trust and the way we got to know each other. Equally as important are conferences, company picnics and the time we spend around the watercooler. The more familiar we are with each other, the stronger our bonds. Social interaction is also important for the leaders of an organization.

Roaming the halls of the office and engaging with people beyond meetings really matters. Perhaps the closest example of a modern system that mimics our ancestral kinship societies is the college dorm. Though students may have their own rooms which are usually shared , doors are often left open as students socialize between the rooms. The hallway becomes the center of social life and rooms are for homework and sleeping and sometimes not even that.

The bonds of friendship that form in those dorms are vital. Our success as a species was not luck—it was earned. We worked hard to get to where we are today and we did it together. We are, at a deeply ingrained and biological level, social machines. And when we work to help each other, our bodies reward us for our effort so that we will continue to do it. Our Chemical Dependency trial and error of evolution, almost every detail about our physiology is there for a reason.

Our taste buds tell our digestive systems which enzymes to release to best deal with the food that is on its way down, just like our sense of smell helps us detect if food is spoiled or not. Similarly our eyebrows were designed to help channel sweat away from our eyes when we were running toward prey—or running away to avoid becoming prey.

Everything about our bodies was designed with one goal—to help us survive. This includes the feelings of happiness. Just as any parent, teacher or manager knows, if they offer the promise of bounty, like candy, gold stars or performance bonuses—or the threat of punishment—they can get the behavior they want. They know we will focus our attention on tasks that produce the results that earn us rewards.

We know that we earn our bonuses only when we get the results they want. And for the most part, it works. It works really well, in fact. Mother Nature figured out a lot earlier than our bosses, however, to use an incentive system to condition us to do certain things to achieve desired results. In the case of our biology, our bodies employ a system of positive and negative feelings—happiness, pride, joy or anxiety, for example—to promote behaviors that will enhance our ability to get things done and to cooperate.

Whereas our bosses might reward us with an end-of-year bonus, our bodies reward us for working to keep ourselves and those around us alive and looked after with chemicals that make us feel good. And now, after thousands of years, we are all completely and utterly chemical-dependent. Whether acting alone or in concert, in small doses or large, anytime we feel any sense of happiness or joy, odds are it is because one or more of these chemicals is coursing through our veins.

They each serve a very real and practical purpose: our survival. The Paradox of Being Human as individuals and as members of groups at all times. I am one and I am one of many. This also creates some inherent conflicts of interest. When we make decisions, we must weigh the benefits to us personally against the benefits to our tribe or collective. Working exclusively to advance ourselves may hurt the group, while working exclusively to advance the group may come at a cost to us as individuals.

This tension often weighs on our consciences when we make decisions. I appreciate the irony that we even debate, as individuals and as groups, which one is primary. The fact is, both are true. Even in our own biology, there exists this seeming conflict of interest. Of the four primary chemical incentives in our bodies, two evolved primarily to help us find food and get things done while the other two are there to help us socialize and cooperate. The first two chemicals, endorphins and dopamine, work to get us where we need to go as individuals—to persevere, find food, build shelters, invent tools, drive forward and get things done.

The other two, serotonin and oxytocin, are there to incentivize us to work together and develop feelings of trust and loyalty. They work to help strengthen our social bonds so that we are more likely to work together and to cooperate, so that we can ultimately survive and ensure our progeny will live on beyond us. We buy too much because everything we see we want to eat now. Our ancestors of the Paleolithic era lived in times when resources were either scarce or hard to come by.

Imagine if every time we felt hungry, we had to go hunting for a few hours. Odds are our species would not have survived very well with a system like that. And so our bodies, in an effort to get us to repeat behaviors that are in our best interest, came up with a way to encourage us to go hunting and gathering on a regular basis instead of waiting until we were starving. Two chemicals—endorphins and dopamine—are the reason that we are driven to hunt, gather and achieve. These are the chemicals of progress. Often released in response to stress or fear, they mask physical pain with pleasure.

This is one of the reasons runners and other endurance athletes continue to push their bodies harder and harder. It is not simply because they have the discipline to do so; they do it because it actually feels good. They love and sometimes crave the amazing high they can achieve from a hard workout. The biological reason for endorphins, however, has nothing to do with exercise.

It has to do with survival. The caveman application of the chemical feel-good is far more practical. Because of endorphins, humans have a remarkable capacity for physical endurance. They were able to track an animal over great distances and then still have the stamina to make it home again. If the trusty hunters gave up at any time simply because they were exhausted, then they, and those in their tribe, would not eat very often and would eventually die off.

And so Mother Nature designed a clever incentive to encourage us to keep going—a little endorphin rush. We can actually develop a craving for endorphins. Our ancestors probably wanted to go hunting and gathering not simply because they knew they had to, but because it often felt good to go. Again, the human body wants us to feel good when we go looking for food or when we are doing the hard work of building shelter so that we will more likely do it. Thanks to cars and supermarkets, however, we live in a world with readily available and abundant resources. The body no longer rewards the search for food, at least not with endorphins.

In this day and age, we basically get our endorphin hits from exercise or manual labor. With at least one notable exception. Stephen Colbert, political satirist and host of The Colbert Report, commented during an interview on the importance of laughter in tense times. Laughing actually releases endorphins. We like laughing for the same reason runners like running—it feels good. It is the high we get, which continues after the laughing has ceased, that makes it hard to be, as Colbert says, afraid at the same time.

During tense times, a little lightheartedness may go a long way to help relax those around us and reduce tensions so that we can focus on getting our jobs done. As President Ronald Reagan famously joked with the chief surgeon on March 30, , as he was wheeled into the operating room at George Washington University Hospital, after being shot by John Hinckley Jr. We all know how good it feels to cross something off our to-do list. That feeling of progress or accomplishment is primarily because of dopamine.

Long before agriculture or supermarkets, humans spent a good portion of their time in search of the next meal. So Mother Nature designed a clever way to help us stay focused on the task at hand. One way we get dopamine is from eating, which is one of the reasons we enjoy it. And so we try to repeat the behaviors that get us food. It is dopamine that makes us a goal-oriented species with a bias for progress. Back in the Paleolithic era, if someone saw a tree filled with fruit, for example, dopamine was released to incentivize them to stay focused on the task and go get the food. As they made progress toward that fruit tree, they would see it getting slightly bigger, an indication they were getting closer.

And with each sign of progress, they would get another little hit of dopamine to keep them on their way. And another, and another until they got a big hit when they finally reached their goal. Each milestone we pass is a metric, a way to see that the fruit tree is getting closer and closer. Like a marathon runner who passes each mile marker toward the finish line, our bodies reward us with dopamine so that we will keep going, working even harder to reach that huge pot of dopamine, that intense feeling of accomplishment at the end.

Obviously the bigger the goal, the more effort it requires, the more dopamine we get. This is why it feels really good to work hard to accomplish something difficult, while doing something quick and easy may only give us a little hit if anything at all. In other words, it feels good to put in a lot of effort to accomplish something. There is no biological incentive to do nothing. Our Goals Must Be Tangible visually oriented animals. We seem to trust our eyes more than any of our other senses. Like seeing that fruit-filled tree in the distance, if we are able to physically see what we are setting out to accomplish or clearly imagine it, then we are indeed, thanks to the powers of dopamine, more likely to accomplish that goal.

This is the reason we like to be given a clear goal to achieve to receive a bonus instead of being given some amorphous instructions. Give us something specific to set our sights on, something we can measure our progress toward, and we are more likely to achieve it. This is why people who balance their checkbooks or maintain a budget are more likely to save or not overspend. Saving is not a state of mind; it is a goal to be achieved. Respected by whom? The customers? The shareholders? The employees? A good vision statement, in contrast, explains, in specific terms, what the world would look like if everything we did was wildly successful.

Martin Luther King Jr. And if we find that vision inspiring and worthy of our time and energy, then we can more easily plan the steps we need to take to achieve that vision. Short or long term, the clearer we can see what we are setting out to achieve, the more likely we are to achieve it. When the system works as designed, we stay well fed, get our work done and make progress. Dopamine can help us get through college, become a doctor or work tirelessly to realize an imagined vision of the future.

But there is some fine print at the bottom of the bottle that is often missed. Dopamine is also highly, highly addictive. As helpful as it is, we can also form neural connections that do not help us survive—in fact, they may do the complete opposite. The behaviors we reinforce can actually do us harm. Cocaine, nicotine, alcohol and gambling all release dopamine. And the feeling can be intoxicating. The chemical effects notwithstanding, the addictions we have to these things and lots of other things that feel good are all basically dopamine addictions. The only variation is the behavior that is reinforced that gives us the next hit of dopamine. There is another thing to add to that list of things that can hijack our dopamine reward system: social media. As it should.

Some of us have formed neural connections that drive us to carry our phones in our hands at all times, often looking down and hitting refresh a few times, even though nothing has come in. Gimme dopamine! It is said that if you wake up in the morning and the first thing you crave is a drink, you might be an alcoholic. If you wake up in the morning and the first thing you do is check your phone to read e- mail or scan through your social media before you even get out of bed, you might be an addict. Craving a hit of chemical feel good, we repeat the behaviors that we know can produce that hit.

In the case of alcohol or gambling, we are aware of it. In the case of our love of our devices and social media, we are less aware of the addictive qualities. But I will save that discussion for later. It is because of dopamine that, in our modern day, we like shopping or collecting things—though there is no rational benefit to most of our hobbies, we enjoy them because they satisfy our prehistoric foraging desires. We spend more time and money than is wise and sometimes sacrifice our relationships just so we can get another hit. Accomplishment may be fueled by dopamine. But that feeling of fulfillment, those lasting feelings of happiness and loyalty, all require engagement with others. Though we may not reminisce about that goal we hit a decade ago, we will talk about the friends we made as we struggled to make it.

The good news is we also have chemical incentives that reward us with positive feelings when we act in ways that would earn us the trust, love and loyalty of others. All we have to do to get those feelings is give a little. Which is pretty handy, because, as we all know, we can get even more done together, working with people we trust, than we can alone. Endorphins and dopamine work together to ensure our survival as it relates to food and shelter. They help us get things done so that we will be housed and fed.

Without endorphins to give us the edge we need to keep going, we would not keep striving even when we were tired and exhausted. Together is better. The Selfless Chemicals achieving are only part of our story. It is the selfless chemicals that make us feel valued when we are in the company of those we trust, give us the feeling of belonging and inspire us to want to work for the good of the group.

It is the selfless chemicals that keep the Circle of Safety strong. Seeing the food, they both lunge at it. The faster, stronger of the two will be the one to eat that day. Acting completely out of instinct, it will consume the carcass and swim away with a full stomach and absolutely no care in the world about the other crocodile. And though the other crocodile may swim away hungry, it will harbor no ill will toward its adversary. The animals have no positive feelings when cooperation is offered and thus no incentive to cooperate. They are, by design, cold-hearted loners. Nothing personal. All instinct. And, for a crocodile, it works.

We, however, are not like crocodiles. Though we may share the primitive, reptilian portion of our brain with them, our brain continued to grow beyond its reptile roots. We are anything but loners. The addition of the mammalian layer of our brain helped us to become highly functioning social animals. And for good reason. Whether we like to admit it or not, we need each other. They are the backbone of the Circle of Safety. There to encourage pro-social behavior, serotonin and oxytocin help us form bonds of trust and friendship so that we will look out for each other.

It is because of these two chemicals that we have societies and cultures. And it is because of these chemicals that we pull together to accomplish much bigger things than if we were to face the world alone. When we cooperate or look out for others, serotonin and oxytocin reward us with the feelings of security, fulfillment, belonging, trust and camaraderie. And when that happens, when we find ourselves inside a Circle of Safety, stress declines, fulfillment rises, our want to serve others increases and our willingness to trust others to watch our backs skyrockets.

When these social incentives are inhibited, however, we become more selfish and more aggressive. Leadership falters. Cooperation declines. Stress increases as do paranoia and mistrust. If we work in environments that make it harder to earn these incentives, then our desire to help our colleagues or the organization diminishes. And, absent the presence of commitment, any desire our colleagues may have to help us also declines. A vicious cycle is set in motion. The less our colleagues and leaders look out for us, the less we look out for them. The less we look out for them, the more selfish they become and, as a result, the more selfish we become.

And when that happens, eventually everyone loses. Oxytocin and serotonin grease the social machine. And when they are missing, friction results. When the leaders of an organization create a culture that inhibits the release of these chemicals, it is tantamount to sabotage—sabotage of our careers and our happiness and sabotage of the success of the organization itself. When the conditions are right, when a strong Circle of Safety is present and felt by all, we do what we do best.

We act in the manner for which we are designed. We pull together. The year was Serotonin is the feeling of pride. It is the feeling we get when we perceive that others like or respect us. It makes us feel strong and confident, like we can take on anything. And more than confidence boosting, it raises our status. The respect Sally Field received from the community significantly impacted her career.

An Oscar winner is able to make more money to appear in a film, will have more opportunities to pick and choose the films they would prefer to work on and will command greater clout. As social animals, we more than want the approval of those in our tribe, we need it. It really matters. We all want to feel valuable for the effort we put forth for the good of others in the group or the group itself. We want to feel that we and the work we do are valued by others, especially those in our group. It is because of serotonin that a college graduate feels a sense of pride and feels their confidence and status rise as they walk across the stage to receive their diploma. Technically, all a student needs to graduate is to pay their bills, fulfill their requirements and collect enough credits.

At the moment that college graduate feels the serotonin course through their veins as they receive their diploma, their parents, sitting in the audience, also get bursts of serotonin and feel equally as proud. Serotonin is attempting to reinforce the bond between parent and child, teacher and student, coach and player, boss and employee, leader and follower. And when others offer us that protection and support, because of serotonin, we feel a sense of accountability to them. Remember, these chemicals control our feelings. We want them to feel that the sacrifices they made for us were worth it. We want to make them proud. And if we are the ones giving the support, we feel an equal sense of responsibility. We want to do right by them so that they can accomplish all that they set out to do.

This helps explain why it feels different to cross a finish line alone, without spectators, compared to when a crowd cheers as we break the tape. In both cases, the accomplishment is the same, the time is the same, even the effort is the same. The only difference is that in one case, there are others there to witness and cheer for us. One of the things that kept me going was knowing that my friends and family had come out to support me. They spent their valuable time and energy to brave the traffic and crowds simply to get a quick glimpse of me as I ran past.

We even planned when and where I would be because it made them proud to see me out there doing something hard. And it inspired me to keep pushing myself, simply knowing they were there. Because of serotonin, I was now running for them too. And it helped. If all I wanted to accomplish was to run I ran on the day my family came out to support me. The day the organizers offered me a crowd to cheer me on. Better still, I got to wear a medal, a symbol of the accomplishment, which made me feel proud when I wore it around my neck. Serotonin feels good. The more we give of ourselves to see others succeed, the greater our value to the group and the more respect they offer us.

The more respect and recognition we receive, the higher our status in the group and the more incentive we have to continue to give to the group. Whether we are a boss, coach or parent, serotonin is working to encourage us to serve those for whom we are directly responsible. And if we are the employee, player or the one being looked after, the serotonin encourages us to work hard to make them proud. And being the alpha—the strong, supportive one of the group, the one willing to sacrifice time and energy so that others may gain—is a prerequisite for leadership. It is the feeling we get when we do something nice for someone or someone does something nice for us. It is responsible for all the warm and fuzzies. But oxytocin is not there just to make us feel good.

It is vital to our survival instincts. Without oxytocin there would be no empathy. It is because of oxytocin that we feel human connections and like being in the company of people we like. Oxytocin makes us social. As a species that can accomplish more in groups than as individuals, we need to have the instinct to know whom to trust. In a group, no one person has to maintain a constant state of vigilance to make sure they are safe. If we are among people we trust and who trust us, that responsibility can now be shared among the entire group.

In other words, we can fall asleep at night confident that someone else will watch for danger. Oxytocin is the chemical that helps direct how vulnerable we can afford to make ourselves. Unlike dopamine, which is about instant gratification, oxytocin is long-lasting. The more time we spend with someone, the more we are willing to make ourselves vulnerable around them. As we learn to trust them and earn their trust in return, the more oxytocin flows. In time, as if by magic, we will realize that we have developed a deep bond with this person.

The madness and excitement and spontaneity of the dopamine hit is replaced by a more relaxed, more stable, more long-term oxytocin- driven relationship. But the trust we need to feel that our colleagues would watch our backs and help us grow, to really feel like we belong, takes time and energy. Personally or professionally, all the same rules of relationship building apply. Inside a Circle of Safety, we feel like we belong.

As much as we want to stand out and consider ourselves individuals, at our core, we are herd animals that are biologically designed to find comfort when we feel like we belong to a group. Our brains are wired to release oxytocin when in the presence of our tribe and cortisol, the chemical that produces the feeling of anxiety, when we feel vulnerable and alone. For our prehistoric ancestors, as well as all social mammals, our sense of belonging and confidence that we can face the dangers around us literally depend on feeling safe in our group. Being on the periphery is dangerous. Someone who feels like a bit of a social misfit because of an unusually high love of Star Wars or superheroes finds great camaraderie when attending Comic Con or some other fan convention.

To be around others like us makes us feel like we belong and gives us a sense of safety. We feel accepted as part of the group and no longer suffer the anxiety of feeling like we are on the edges. There are few feelings that human beings crave more than a sense of belonging. Without a thought, we bent down and helped him gather up his papers, and I pointed out to him that his bag was open.

That tiny favor, that little expense of time and energy, with no expectation of anything in return, gave me a small shot of oxytocin. It feels good to help people. The man we helped also got a small shot of oxytocin, because it feels good when someone does something nice for us too. We stood up and continued walking. When my friend and I reached the end of the block, we stood and waited for the light to change so we could cross the street. That was really cool. Not only does the person performing even the tiniest act of courtesy get a shot of oxytocin, not only does the person on the receiving end of an act also get a shot, but someone who witnesses the act of generosity also gets some chemical feel good.

Simply seeing or hearing about acts of human generosity actually inspires us to want to do the same. I can almost promise you that that guy who turned around to tell us he had seen what we had done very likely did something nice for someone that day. This is one of the reasons we find movies or news stories of incredible selfless acts so inspiring. This is the power of oxytocin. It actually makes us good people. The more good things we do, the more good we want to do.

It is also the reason it feels nice to hold hands with someone and the reason young children seem to always want to touch and hug their mothers. It is also part of the reinforcing bond between athletes, for example, when they high-five, fist-bump or smack each other. It reinforces the bond they share and the commitment they have to work together for their common goal. Suppose you are about to seal a deal with someone. They have agreed to all the terms laid out in the contract. You will either call the whole deal off or you will go into the deal a little more nervous.

If our president were ever seen shaking hands at a UN event with some horrible dictator, it would cause a massive scandal. A simple handshake. Oxytocin really is magical stuff. Not only is it behind the feelings of trust and loyalty, it also makes us feel good and inspires us to do nice things for others. Mother Nature wants the ones who give to others to keep their genes in the gene pool. That may be one of the reasons oxytocin actually helps us live longer. A person who is good to others in the group is good for the species. According to a study published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in , people who claim to be happy live 35 percent longer than less happy people. The study of 3, men and women aged fifty-two to seventy-nine found that those who rated their happiness the highest were far less likely to die in the following five years than those who were the least happy, even after accounting for demographic factors such as wealth, occupation and health-related behavior such as smoking and obesity.

Oxytocin boosts our immune systems, makes us better problem solvers and makes us more resistant to the addictive qualities of dopamine. Unlike dopamine, which is largely responsible for instant gratification, oxytocin gives us lasting feelings of calm and safety. Because of oxytocin, just knowing our friends and family are there, just looking at a picture of the people whom we love and who love us, make us feel good and not feel alone. And when that happens, we want more than anything else to do what we can to help them feel the same way. A day just like one would expect for that time of year.

There was a calm, gentle breeze that broke the intensity of the sun. It was, by all accounts, a perfect day. All of a sudden, out of the corner of an eye, the calm was shattered. Perhaps it was a rustle of the grass or maybe he thought he saw something. All that mattered was that there might have been something out there. Something dangerous. Something deadly. The anxiety alone was quite enough for the gazelle to stop grazing and immediately lift its head to try to see what it hoped was not a lion. Another gazelle noticed that one of the members of its group was alerted to a possible threat and it too immediately stopped eating to look up—two sets of eyes are better than one.

Before long, the whole group had joined in. None of them knew what specifically they were looking for—they only knew that if one of the members of the group felt threatened, they should all feel threatened. Whether they also saw the lion or not, all the gazelles in the herd followed in the same direction, all running at full speed. The surprise attack was foiled and all the gazelles got to live another day. This is one of the primary benefits of group living—every member of the group can help look out for danger. It is a familiar scene played out in many a nature documentary.

But the response from the gazelles is always the same. Archived from the original on 25 March Retrieved 25 March Retrieved 26 February Archived from the original on 25 February Retrieved 26 May BBC Sport. The Daily Telegraph. Children's Institute. Archived from the original PDF on 26 February Retrieved 15 May Archived from the original PDF on 31 March Retrieved 11 February South African Government Online. The Observer. Peninsula Peace and Justice Center.

BBC News. The Body. Retrieved 25 February Archived from the original on 18 July The Globe and Mail. Retrieved 11 May Retrieved 3 October CBS News. Archived from the original on 15 January Retrieved 13 December Retrieved 27 October Archived from the original on 26 June Los Angeles Times. NBC News. Associated Press. Fox News Channel. The Independent. Archived from the original on 16 March Retrieved 13 September Archived from the original on 9 July The Telegraph. Archived from the original on 27 January News Retrieved 30 January Retrieved 15 December CTV News. Archived from the original on 19 April Retrieved 10 June Archived from the original on 8 April Retrieved 6 April Retrieved 8 June Retrieved 5 July Archived from the original on 26 January Retrieved 27 June Archived from the original on 4 March Retrieved 1 September Al Jazeera.

Archived from the original on 15 April Retrieved 5 December Retrieved 6 December Retrieved 11 December Retrieved 4 December Archived from the original on 16 January Retrieved 13 July Archived from the original on 3 February International Business Times. The Cape Times. Archived from the original on 7 February Retrieved 14 February — via Questia Online Library. The White House. Retrieved 26 October Archived from the original on 22 October Retrieved 24 October Retrieved 14 February London: Independent Print Limited. Retrieved 7 June African National Congress. Archived from the original on 1 October Retrieved 2 January Spanish Official State Gazette. Queen's Printer for Canada. CBC News. Royal Insight. November Archived from the original on 5 January Gauteng Provincial Government.

Archived from the original on 21 June Media Club South Africa. Retrieved 30 November Retrieved 23 December Retrieved 11 November United Nations. Retrieved 23 January Barber, James ISBN Barnard, Rita In Rita Barnard ed. The Cambridge Companion to Nelson Mandela. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Battersby, John In Anthony Sampson ed. Mandela: The Authorised Biography.

London: HarperCollins. Benneyworth, Garth South African Historical Journal. S2CID Benson, Mary Nelson Mandela. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books. Boehmer, Elleke Oxford: Oxford University Press. Bromley, Roger Broun, Kenneth S. Ellis, Stephen Journal of Southern African Studies. Cold War History. Forster, Dion Studia Historiae Ecclesiasticae. Freund, Bill African Political Economy. Glad, Betty; Blanton, Robert Presidential Studies Quarterly. JSTOR Guiloineau, Jean; Rowe, Joseph Berkeley: North Atlantic Books. Herbst, Jeffrey In Theodore K. Rabb; Ezra N. Suleiman eds. London: Routledge. Houston, Gregory; Muthien, Yvonne Democracy and Governance Review: Mandela's Legacy — Hutton, Barbara Robben Island: Symbol of Resistance.

Bellville: Pearson South Africa. Kalumba, Kibujjo M. Journal of Social Philosophy. Lodge, Tom Mandela: A Critical Life. Lukhele, Francis Canadian Journal of African Studies. Mafela, Munzhedzi James Indigenous Biography and Autobiography. Archived from the original on 24 July Retrieved 15 June Mandela, Nelson Long Walk to Freedom Volume I: — Little, Brown and Company. Mandela, Nelson []. Mangcu, Xolela Meer, Fatima London: Hamish Hamilton. Meredith, Martin Mandela: A Biography. New York: PublicAffairs.

Ndlovu-Gatsheni, Sabelo J. Third World Quarterly. Oppenheim, Claire E. Soudien, Crain Suttner, Raymond African Historical Review. African Identities. Journal of Asian and African Studies. Nelson, Steven Read, James H. Journal of Power. Sampson, Anthony []. Smith, David James Young Mandela. Tomaselli, Keyan; Tomaselli, Ruth

Web hosting by Somee.com